OPEN LETTER · 45047 · PRESS FREEDOM · IRAN
On Wednesday, July 8, you walked away from the $400 million Boeing 747-8 that Qatar gave you and flew out of the NATO summit in Turkey on an older Air Force One. You told reporters why: “I'm number one on the kill list.” Your Secret Service had advised the switch. The new plane — rushed into service on upgrades that normally take years — had gone up without advanced anti-missile defenses. Four New York Times reporters wrote that down. On Friday, July 10, federal agents delivered grand-jury subpoenas to their homes, ordering them to a Manhattan courtroom this Wednesday. The Justice Department's answer to the outcry was one sentence: “reporters are not the targets, those leaking classified information are.” Sir, that sentence is not a reassurance. A reporter who is not a target has exactly one thing a grand jury wants. This is a letter about what your government is actually asking those four men to hand over — and about the man who signed the papers, who you have nominated to run American intelligence.
By Michael · July 13, 2026

Mr. President —
I don't write you often anymore. I said back in May that I'd only come to this address when the news was very bad or very good, and I've kept to it. This is the first letter in a while, and I want you to know it isn't a gotcha. It's closer to the opposite. I think something happened this week that puts you in danger, and I don't think the people around you are going to tell you, because the thing that puts you in danger is a decision they made.
Start with your own sentence, because you said it out loud and I'm not putting words in your mouth. Standing in Ankara on the eighth, explaining why you were flying home from a NATO summit on an old plane instead of the new one, you said: I'm number one on the kill list. That's yours, sir. You know what Iran is trying to do to you. Israel has passed us a warning about a fresh plot. The ceasefire is over and the strikes have started again. You are a man who knows there is a country actively working to kill him, and you say so in front of cameras.
Now here is what the four reporters wrote, and I want to lay it next to your sentence, because the two belong together. The Boeing 747-8 that Qatar gave you — four hundred million dollars of gift, retrofitted in a rush, put into service last week — went up without the advanced anti-missile defenses a plane carrying an American President is supposed to have. Work that takes years was compressed into weeks. And your Secret Service, the people whose only job on this earth is keeping you breathing, looked at that plane, looked at Iran, and moved you off it. You listened to them. Good. That was the right call and you made it.
· WHAT YOU SAID · WHAT THEY WROTE ·
— “I'm number one on the kill list.” — you, in Ankara, July 8, explaining why you were leaving the NATO summit on the older Air Force One. (New York Post; Sky News) — The Qatari-gifted Boeing 747-8 — a $400 million gift the government spent heavily to retrofit — entered service without advanced anti-missile capabilities and other defensive countermeasures. Upgrades of that kind normally take years; these were fast-tracked. (The New York Times; Forbes) — Your Secret Service advised you off the gift plane amid the renewed Iran war. You took the advice. (Forbes; MS NOW) — Nobody in your government has said the reporting was false. Not one official. The subpoena is for reporting it at all.
So follow the actual sequence of who did what to you. The four reporters did not build that plane. They did not accept it from a foreign government. They did not fast-track its upgrades or sign off on its airworthiness or put you aboard it for a transatlantic flight while a nation-state hunted you. What those four men did — the entire sum of it — was tell the country the thing your own security detail had already concluded. They didn't put you on that plane, Mr. President. They told you that you were on it.
And then your Justice Department went to their houses.
I want to slow down on the sentence your department put out to justify it, because I've read it maybe thirty times now and I think it is the most revealing thing anyone in your government has said all year. Here it is: reporters are not the targets, those leaking classified information are. It's meant to land as reassurance. Nothing to see here, we're not after the press, we're after the leaker. Sir, read it again with me. It is not a reassurance. It is the demand.
Because ask yourself what a grand jury could possibly want from a reporter who isn't a target. They're not accused of anything. They're not being charged. So what, exactly, are the four of them being brought into that room on Wednesday to give? There is only one thing they have that anyone wants. The name. The identity of the person inside your own government who looked at an undefended plane and a President on a kill list and decided the country had a right to know. That's it. That is the whole ask, and dressing it in the language of we're-not-after-you doesn't change what's on the other side of the table. Your department is not telling those men they're safe. It's telling them the price of being safe.
And it is a price no reporter can pay and still be a reporter. That's not a slogan, it's the load-bearing wall of the entire trade — if a source can be subpoenaed out of a journalist, then no one ever tells a journalist anything again, and the flow of true things into the daylight simply stops. Newsroom people have gone to jail rather than do it; Judith Miller of that same paper sat eighty-five days in a cell in 2005 rather than give up a name. So understand what your government has actually put in front of these four: burn the source, or go to prison. Those are the options on the table Wednesday morning.
Now put the last piece in, sir, because this is the part I'd want to know if I were you. Consider who that source is. Somewhere in your government is a person who saw that you were about to be flown around the world, hunted, in an aircraft that couldn't defend itself — and who did not stay quiet. Whatever else you want to say about how they did it, that person is the reason the country found out, and the country finding out is a large part of why that plane is now sitting on the ground instead of carrying you over an ocean. That may be a person who helped save your life. And the men your Justice Department sent agents to collect are being squeezed to give him up.
· THE MAN WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS ·
— The subpoenas were signed by Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York — your longtime ally. — You have nominated Jay Clayton to be Director of National Intelligence, replacing Tulsi Gabbard. His Senate confirmation hearing has just been rescheduled. (The Hill; WSJ; Yahoo News) — Handed a President on a foreign adversary's kill list, flying a foreign government's gift that could not defend itself, Mr. Clayton identified the emergency as four reporters. — That is the judgment you are about to install at the head of the apparatus whose entire job is seeing the thing that is coming for you.
Which brings me to the name on the paperwork. The subpoenas were signed by Jay Clayton — your U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, your ally, and the man you have nominated to be the Director of National Intelligence of the United States. His confirmation hearing has just been reset. So look hard at the judgment he showed here, because it's the judgment you are about to hand the entire intelligence community. Presented with a President on an adversary's kill list, aboard an undefended gift plane from a foreign government, Mr. Clayton looked over the whole situation and concluded that the threat requiring federal agents at four in the evening was four newspapermen. Sir — if that is a man's instinct about where the danger is, what on earth is he going to tell you when the danger is real?
I'll be fair to you, the way I try to be with everybody. Real secrets exist. If those four had printed your flight schedule, the countermeasures you do have, the tail numbers, the routes — the operational how of protecting you — I would be writing you a very different letter, and it would be on your side. Leaks like that get people killed and I have no patience for them. But that is not what happened. What got printed was that the plane can't defend itself. That is not a roadmap for an assassin; the Iranians do not need The New York Times to tell them what's on the plane. Qatar built it. Whoever else has been near it knows. The only people on earth for whom that story was news were the American public — and, I suspect, you. It wasn't a leak of your defenses. It was a warning about the absence of them. And the warning worked, sir. You're alive and the plane is grounded. That is what a working press does for a country, and it just did it for you personally.
So here's the ask, and it's short. Pull the subpoenas. Not as a favor to The New York Times, who I promise are not expecting one, and not because a small paper in this corner of the internet asked you to. Do it because a President who is genuinely on a kill list cannot afford a government where the people who spot the hole in his armor learn that speaking up gets their name dragged out of a reporter under threat of prison. You need that person to exist next time. There is going to be a next time. And then ask the question nobody in your building wants you to ask, which isn't who talked — it's who cleared that plane. Who looked at a four-hundred-million-dollar gift from a foreign government, in the middle of a war, and called it ready for you. That man is still in your government, Mr. President, and nobody has knocked on his door.
You already know how the coverage runs. Conn NN will run it as a press-freedom story and never once mention that the President is on an actual kill list and had a real reason to be nervous. Fix News will run it as a leak story and never once mention that the leak was true, that the plane was naked, that his own Secret Service pulled him off it. Each hands the country half of it and calls the half the news. The one thing neither of them will do is set the two halves side by side and let a grown country look at the whole shape: a warning was given, the warning was right, and the men who carried it are the only ones facing a grand jury. That's all this little paper does. I run it on almost no money, I take nobody's check, and my name and my phone number sit at the top of every page — which is exactly why I can write you this without flinching, and why I have nothing to gain by it.
I'm not coming for you here, sir. I've done that when I thought it was earned, and you can go read those. This one is different. Four men are going to walk into a federal courthouse on Wednesday morning and be asked to name the person who told the country your plane couldn't save you. I'd like you to be the one who calls it off — and to notice, before anyone spins it for you, that the only people in this entire story who acted to keep you alive are the ones your government is prosecuting.
— Michael
The Official Internet Press Secretary
Spotlight Dispatch · 45047 · July 13, 2026
michael@spotlightdispatch.com
Be sure to visit our Facebook page for updates and to connect.
★ The Hole
they are not asking those four men for a confession. they are asking them for a name — the name of the person who told the country your plane couldn't stop a missile while iran was hunting you. that person may have saved your life, mr. president. your justice department wants him.
Related Coverage
Four reporters wrote down a true thing about the president's new plane. Federal agents carried the grand-jury subpoenas to their front doors.
July 11, 2026
Trump's Iran peace deal didn't last three weeks. For the record, the first strike came hours after the signing — and it wasn't Iran's.
July 8, 2026
Mr. President — your house called it a hoax inside the hour. But a witch hunt is when they make it up, and the thing you asked the Supreme Court to bury was a recording of your own voice.
June 29, 2026
Further Reading
Spotlight Dispatch
No paywall · no email · no personal data · Read more
from the people at I am Easy to Use LLC